Best technographics data providers in 2026
Eleven technographics providers, ordered by how much of the count each one publishes free. Every figure below was read from the provider's own pages on 3 September 2026.
Providers that publish a count come first. Providers that publish no count come last.
1. Installmap
A research site that publishes counts of the software detected on company websites, cut by industry, employee size band and country, with the crawl and its attrition funnel written up on the method page. Publishes every count with the crawled base it divides by, cuts by industry, employee band and country, and a method page carrying the attrition funnel. Free to cite.
2. Enlyft
A B2B account intelligence platform for technology vendors and their channel partners. It scores accounts using technographic and other signals, and drafts outreach for a seller to review. Publishes company counts and industry, country and size breakdowns free, but no sample definition, no attrition funnel and no price.
Installmap vs Enlyft · enlyft.com
3. TheirStack
A search product over job postings and company technographics. You search companies by the technologies they use and what they hire for, then reveal or export the matching companies. Publishes a total company count per technology with country breakdowns, and meters the companies behind it at $0.109 a credit and up.
Installmap vs TheirStack · theirstack.com
4. BuiltWith
A website technology profiler that detects what a site runs and builds lists of sites by detected technology, keyword or spend. It also holds historical technology records and pushes lists into CRMs. Publishes trend data free, gates the lists behind $295 to $995 a month, and states no sample or failure counts.
Installmap vs BuiltWith · builtwith.com
5. NerdyData
A code search engine over live domains. You search the HTML, JavaScript, CSS, headers, cookies and XHR URLs of crawled sites to build lists of websites using a technology, and look up one domain's stack. Shows a total result count before purchase, publishes no industry or size cut, and starts at $200 a month.
Installmap vs NerdyData · nerdydata.com
6. PublicWWW
A source code search engine over indexed web pages. You search for any snippet, signature or keyword inside page HTML, JavaScript and CSS, and get the list of sites containing it. Returns a page count for a code snippet rather than a share of a defined sample, and publishes no firmographic cut.
Installmap vs PublicWWW · publicwww.com
7. Wappalyzer
A technology lookup service that reports the technologies, company details and contact data behind a website, and builds prospect lists filtered by technology, keyword, market position and geography. Publishes no market share count and no segment cut; the lists start at $250 a month with lookups metered.
Installmap vs Wappalyzer · wappalyzer.com
8. SimilarTech
A web technology analysis site, branded SimilarTech, a Similarweb company. It offers company and website technology breakdowns, competitor comparison, search for companies by technology, and contact lists built from technology signals. Publishes dataset scale but no counts, and its pricing page returns a 404, so nothing about a purchase can be read.
Installmap vs SimilarTech · similartech.com
9. HG Insights
A B2B revenue intelligence platform combining firmographic, technographic, technology spend and buyer intent data with market sizing, account scoring and sales research modules. Publishes no count, no segment cut and no price, and states that no free trial is available.
Installmap vs HG Insights · hginsights.com
10. Datanyze
A B2B contact data tool built around a Chrome extension that reveals email addresses and phone numbers from LinkedIn profiles and company websites, with contacts and companies tagged into lists. Sells contact reveals by the credit; nothing on its pages describes technology detection or a published count.
Installmap vs Datanyze · datanyze.com
11. StackShare
A public directory of developer and AI tools plus company tech stack profiles that companies and developers submit. Each tool page carries a description, pros and cons, alternatives and an adoption tab. Carries submitted stack profiles rather than a crawl, so there is no sample and no share to cite.